August 07, 2005
Peter Jennings, 1938-2005

Charles Gibson just broke in on ABC with the news that longtime anchor Peter Jennings had died this evening of lung cancer. Jennings died at his apartment in New York City, with his family at his bedside.
Jennings' 41 year career at ABC News counted him as one of ABC's original news anchors, sitting at the helm of Peter Jennings and the News, from 1964 to 1967. Canadian-born Jennings reported from across the world after that, opening the first American television bureau in the Arab world, and helming the bureau in Rome.
In 1975, Jennings became the anchor of A.M. America, the short-lived predecessor to Good Morning America. Shortly after that stint ended, he became ABC's chief foreign correspondent, based in London.
From that London base, Jennings returned to the anchor desk in 1978 as part of the three-anchor team for World News Tonight, along with Frank Reynolds in Washington and Max Robinson in Chicago.
In 1983, Jennings became sole anchor of WNT, where he spent the rest of his life.
Jennings became the defacto managing editor of ABC News, guiding them through the 80s, 90s and into the 21st Century. Many people remember two major highlights of recent years, his marathon anchor job on ABC's mammoth ABC2000 megacast on December 31, 1999 and January 1, 2000; also his steadfastness and rock-solid demeanor amid the chaos and terror of the 9/11 disaster.
Many criticize Jennings' liberal politics, but no one can argue that among the "big three" anchors, Jennings was the most learned, and most scholarly. He was a good guy, and at least I, for one, am sorry to see him depart this life at his age.
Godspeed, PJ, and thanks for the memories.
(More coverage from
Outside The Beltway,
Hennessey's View,
Rhymes With Right,
The Political Teen,
Captain's Quarters,
LGF,
LaShawn Barber,
Michelle Malkin,
Wizbang,
Say Anything,
In The Bullpen,
Patrick Ruffini,
Crooks & Liars,
Protein Wisdom,
TVNewser,
Joe Gandelman,
Ace of Spades,
Unpartisan & others)
Posted by: mhking at
07:06 PM
| Comments (19)
| Add Comment
Post contains 333 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Amen, Mike. The only thing I can add is prayers for his family.
Posted by: steveegg at August 07, 2005 07:10 PM (f8oY2)
2
this is crap.at the end of the day he was no differen't than any other addict that decided to let his demon back in the damn door.he new better.i wounder what the hell made him care so little about his self,for that is at the heart of every addiction even his.i quit smoking 8 years ago on my sons second birthday after several failed attemts i threw 4 ciggarets out of my truck window that morning that i had forgot i had around.almost every one of my kids friends who smoke have parents that smoke.we as a nation need to use peter in are fight to make it known to our young how this dragon works to diminish even are elite.certainly we are not in deniel together.in my book to call yourself a man requires that you have to have the presence to be incontroll of your own will and in the end peter new he failed
Posted by: eric johnson at August 08, 2005 06:19 AM (6mUkl)
3
What an idiot. This guy was no scholar. He told us how horrible smoking was in his reports but was too stupid to listen to his own reports.
Posted by: Geoff at August 08, 2005 06:28 AM (6krEN)
4
He was good at what he was paid to do, and was apparently a very decent human being. However, I take issue with the comment that he was "the most learned and most scholarly" of the big three. To me, Brokaw was clearly more learned.
Posted by: Paul Cohen at August 08, 2005 10:57 AM (o5iKM)
5
Geoff, as usual I see your in typical form.
Posted by: huch1212 at August 08, 2005 12:20 PM (M7kiy)
6
Peter Jennings was a wonderful person. I had the opportunity to meet and become aquainted with peter and his wife when i was showcased as the person of the week. He was truly a caring and considerate man whom I grew to love for his compassion for mankind and his love of people. He had everything financially and physically but he still found time to come to public housing and showcase how it is to beat the odds and not become a part of your environment. I love him and will miss him dearly.
Posted by: Lynda at August 08, 2005 12:34 PM (6krEN)
7
"this is crap.at the end of the day he was no differen't than any other addict that decided to let his demon back in the damn door.he new better.i wounder what the hell made him care so little about his self,for that is at the heart of every addiction even his.i quit smoking 8 years ago on my sons second birthday after several failed attemts i threw 4 ciggarets out of my truck window that morning that i had forgot i had around.almost every one of my kids friends who smoke have parents that smoke.we as a nation need to use peter in are fight to make it known to our young how this dragon works to diminish even are elite.certainly we are not in deniel together.in my book to call yourself a man requires that you have to have the presence to be incontroll of your own will and in the end peter new he failed"
In my book, in order to be a man, you have to know how to spell "our" and know that "his self" is improper English. Maybe Jennings could never get rid of his nasty smoking habit, but at least he picked up a book once in a while. Don't be so mean.
Posted by: Pat at August 08, 2005 12:41 PM (P0nzT)
8
Peter Jennings was far from being an idot. He never graduated from High School but still was able to become the Anchor and Lead Editor for one of the Major on air networks in the US. He will be missed.
Posted by: Norm Seeley at August 08, 2005 01:28 PM (l2LKi)
9
Peter Jennings will be greatly missed. The WNT will never be the same.
Posted by: Janet at August 08, 2005 05:46 PM (M7kiy)
10
How insensitive can one be? If you have nothing positive to say about one that has passed, then for the sake of the family, say nothing!
Posted by: Teresa at August 08, 2005 06:13 PM (6krEN)
11
How insensitive can one be? If you have nothing positive to say about one that has passed, then for the sake of the family, SAY NOTHING!
Posted by: Teresa at August 08, 2005 06:17 PM (6krEN)
12
Peter Jennings was a "lighthouse in the fog" of television journalism. He will truly be missed by the public, and his shoes will be very difficult to fill. As for those who are throwing the put-downs and smears, I pity your black-hearted ignorance..
Posted by: William at August 09, 2005 07:50 AM (AnYdn)
13
Peter Jennings was a wonderful man, whom was great at his job and loved by his family, friends and the public that watched and admired him. He had more class on his worst day, than you people that don't have the consideration or social graces to keep your heartless opinions to yourselves. Hopefully when a loved one of yours passes, other people will be more considerate of your feelings than you are of his family, and friends.
Posted by: DK at August 09, 2005 07:03 PM (ywZa8)
14
To Geoff and Eric Johnson: Your lack of compassion is only matched by your lack of knowledge about lung cancer and Eric, your lack of knowledge about how to spell in the English language.
First, Peter Jennings quit smoking for 20 years--around the 5th and 2nd birthdays of his children. He relapsed for a VERY SHORT TIME after 9/11. Although not a good thing, given the stress and his non-stop reporting, it is at least understandable that someone who smoked for more than 30 years would relapse at such a stressful time. But even had he not relapsed, his chance of developing lung cancer were about 35 times greater than someone who has never smoked. And many researchers believe that once you have smoked for as long as he did, the risk of developing the disease remains high forever.
Where is is written in your world that bashing a decent man who has died of a horrible disease, is okay? Compassion is a great characteristic worth spending some time developing.
Peace and Blessings to you both.
Posted by: Gayle at August 10, 2005 04:41 AM (ywZa8)
15
Peter Jennings,Tom Brokaw and Dan Rather had one major thing in common.They where all card carrying liberal left wing democrats,not one of them was ever a true journalist.A true journalist has to put their political views aside while reporting on a story.None of these man where ever able to do thatThey are in very good company.Im very sorry that Peter died,God Bless his family and friends.A persons death should not make us misrepresent the facts.Peter Jennings did a great job of reporting on all stories that had no link to politics.As the years have gone by this has meant fewer and fewer stories that he could report on honestly.
Posted by: joe flynn at August 10, 2005 12:16 PM (iQrXf)
16
Our family was very fortunate to be invited to bring our daughter Adora Svitak to appear on Good Morning America on Feb 23, 2005. Peter Jennings was on the show to promote his UFO documentary that day. He was extremely kind to express interest in what Adora was doing on the show. Adora has been writing since she was four years old. She was on the program to show her writing talent to the viewers. Mr. Peter Jennings showed so much interest in a little child touched us so much. We have always enjoyed watching Peter Jennings' news show the most for many years. We deeply respect his intelligence and knowledge of the world affairs. We couldn't never imagine to have the opportunity to meet such great person, let alone witness him showing interest in our child. What touched us the most is after he looked over what Adora was doing, he came to talk to us. After he was told that Adora enjoys learning about history, he took out his pen and write down the information and told us that he would send his history book to Adora and Adrianna. We couldn't believe that he would care so much to take time from his extremely busy schedule to care for a young child who loves history. Adora loves his book so much and she finished in two days and she keeps reading it over and over. We owe our daughter's present and future success to Mr. Peter Jennings. Because of his pure kindness and passion to share the knowledge of history. Our daughter becomes even more passionate about history. We just want to let the whole world know how loving, caring, generous and kind Mr. Peter Jennings is. He is the most wonderful person we have ever met! Our daughters often ask about how he is doing with his fight with his cancer. We are very hopeful that he will win the battle and come back to host the show soon. Thank you very much.
It seems that the wonderful words about Peter Jennings will never end! I am one of the very fortunate one as well. My few minutes of talking to Peter Jennings really has changed my life and my daughter's as well. Just a little than one month ago before he announced that he had cancer, our family met him on the site of ABC Good Morning America show. He came over to ask why our little seven year old daughter Adora Svitak was on the show. He just came back from visiting the affiliate station (Komo4 in seattle) from Seattle and found out that we are from Seattle as well. He was so friendly and enjoyable to talk to. He was very excited to find out what Adora is passionate about--Hisotry. He immediately asked for the address so he could send his book to her. He was so kind and didn't want to leave Adora's sister out so he wrote down her name as well. We got his signed book few days after we arrived home from NY. We will treasure the memory and the book forever!
With the impact Peter has left for this world, for the contribution he has made in the world, it's just not possible to think that he actually is gone. He can't just go! His love for this country, his love for humanity is so boundless, so moving and so inspiring, he can't just be gone! What makes a great person, so great that we all cry and feel the deep aches in our hearts? He can't be gone, he is too great to be gone! His impact and love for all of us will never be gone!
After I have read so many people's postings for Peter Jennings, I further realized how blessed I have been to have the lifetime chance to meet Mr.Peter Jennings on February 23, 2005 when I was on the show to write my story live for Good Morning America. My family is a great fan of his television program World News Tonight, and I was honored to recieve his excellent History book (The Century for Young People) after Mr. Jennings was informed of my passion for history. I was so touched that he took the time to send me the book, which I enjoyed reading greatly, as it is filled with interesting facts and interviews with people who have experienced the actual events. It is the greatest book I have read, and if you know of any young people, you should make sure to get the book for them. They will learn so much from the book just like myself. I will cherish the book as well as the experience of meeting Mr.Peter Jennings for the rest of my life (I have a long life ahead of me. I am only seven). I even take a great interest in becoming a journalist myself.
I sincerely hope that he will have a speedy recovery and I wish him the best.
Adora Svitak
I have been watching shows about Peter Jennings with my two children throughout the day. After viewing his incredible career, how much Peter has done for our lives, my nine year old daughter Adrianna said: "It doesn't seem that Peter Jennings has gone, it seems that he has lived a million years." Indeed, he has lived a million years with his intelligence, his wisdom, worldly knowledge, his generosity and love for humanity. We are so greatful that we have had Peter Jennings in our lives.
With deep love and respect
The Svitak Family
Here are two poems written by seven year old Adora Svitak who had the great privilege of meeting Peter Jennings on Feb 23, 2005.(Adora was on the Good Morning America to showcase her writing skills, Mr.Peter Jennings was curious like he had always been, he spent time watching and talking to Adora, what a beautiful sight!) Adora's life has been touched and influenced because of the love and passion Mr. Peter Jennings felt for children. We are forever grateful for Mr. Peter Jennings when he took time to send out his fabulous history book he wrote for the young people to our children. Adora loved the book so much and posted her poem on the message board.
The Century for young people
The book you made
Was excellent
It will remain in my mind forever, never to fade
To those who haven't read it, I pity
For this is a great masterpiece
Those who are buying the book now will be all jitty
Because it is so great.
Poem For Peter Jennings (From Adora)
aroda Jul 10, 2005 09:13 PM
We All Miss You
We all miss you, so come back soon
Even the babies are tapping the screen with silver spoons
We all want to hear your voice
And when we do, we shall rejoice.
The angry housewife has got all cross
Now the salmon's turned to moss
Just because you're absent from us
Nobody has the heart to catch the bus.
It seems that the wonderful words about Peter Jennings will never end! I am one of the very fortunate one as well. My few minutes of talking to Peter Jennings really has changed my life and my daughter's as well. Just a little than one month ago before he announced that he had cancer, our family met him on the site of ABC Good Morning America show. He came over to ask why our little seven year old daughter Adora Svitak was on the show. He just came back from visiting the affiliate station (Komo4 in seattle) from Seattle and found out that we are from Seattle as well. He was so friendly and enjoyable to talk to. He was very excited to find out what Adora is passionate about--Hisotry. He immediately asked for the address so he could send his book to her. He was so kind and didn't want to leave Adora's sister out so he wrote down her name as well. We got his signed book few days after we arrived home from NY. We will treasure the memory and the book forever!
Posted by: joyce at August 11, 2005 02:41 PM (mggvO)
17
I never got to meet Peter, but as a child, and even now he was always one of my greatest heros. From the time I was about 6 (I am now 20)up until my JR year of HS, I wanted to be an anchor/reporter my self. I quite frankly cried when I learned that he had passed, even though I no longer planned to be a reporter myself, I always had a great respect for him. I was quite excited when his book, The Century came out and it remains the only book that I made a point to purchace the day that it was released. For those of you that can not find something nice to say about him, please keep your thoughts to your self, You would not like it one bit if you had died and people put such things in a memoir of you, please show that respect for him and his family. Godspeed, Peter.
Posted by: Elizabeth at August 16, 2005 12:01 AM (lbjjq)
18
A very good and informative article indeed . It helps me a lot to enhance my knowledge, I really like the way the writer presented his views.
DC Hats.
NFL Hats.
DC Hats.
New Era Hats.
Posted by: Monster Energy Hats at July 20, 2011 09:30 PM (csAS/)
Posted by: bahamas charter flights at October 12, 2011 08:23 AM (LpXxd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 06, 2005
PJ close to death?

Unconfirmed reports this evening from sources inside ABC News, say that World News Tonight anchor Peter Jennings is close to death.
Jennings announced he had been diagnosed with lung cancer in April, and has not been on the air since. Anchor duties have rotated between several anchors, most notably Good Morning America co-anchor Charles Gibson.
Posted by: mhking at
06:33 PM
| Comments (22)
| Add Comment
Post contains 67 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yeah, I suspected as much when he first announced the cancer. It's a tough one to recover from. I figured no matter what, he wasn't coming back to his anchor job.
As a former smoker, I feel for the guy, though. I'm still terrified I may get it. I smoked a long, long time.
Posted by: Meryl Yourish at August 06, 2005 07:38 PM (l54Ij)
2
I smoked from 1966 to 1994. What a stupid thing to start. I never cared much for Peter Jennings, but I would not wish cancer on anyone.
Posted by: AllenS at August 07, 2005 05:34 AM (5xQss)
3
I myself never cared much for Jenning's leftest leaning in the news but as an R.N., I feel for him and his family. Death from lung cancer is slow, painful and ugly. God's speed Peter, I'll see you o the other side and we'll have some spirited debates.
Denzil
Posted by: Denzil Hamblin at August 07, 2005 06:11 AM (Svs3B)
4
Denzil, u might want to pray that he repents of that awful leftist hit-piece he did on Christ a few years ago. Or else u might be seeing him somewhere u don't wanna be.
Posted by: Charlie at August 07, 2005 10:03 AM (M7kiy)
5
If the Lord had mercy on me....He surely will
on Peter....let's pray that Peter's prepared
for eternity
Posted by: patricia mcspadden at August 07, 2005 10:29 AM (vT1G8)
6
My sister in law died earlier this year of lung cancer (at 48, never smoked). She had it for about four years and just never got better, just worse. She had wanted to see her daughter graduate from college, but she died 2 months too early. PJ and his family are in our prayers as we know what is going on (more or less).
Posted by: David at August 07, 2005 10:36 AM (Sho7E)
7
Whether or not you agreed with him, let's all pray that these rumors are false. Let's pray for Peter Jennings to beat his cancer for once and for all, and for him to make a triumphant return to "World News Tonight".
Posted by: Jofus at August 07, 2005 12:13 PM (pTy/f)
8
Ok, lets not get carried away here. (jofus) Nobody wants him to die, but lets not forget that he was a mouthpiece for the ultra-left who twisted the news to fit his own personal liberal ideology; thus decieving millions.
Posted by: Joe at August 07, 2005 12:39 PM (M7kiy)
9
It's a terrible way to go. I think all leftists should be killed painlessly, especially Canadians.
Posted by: Vijay Prozak at August 07, 2005 03:41 PM (xdtnQ)
10
Peter Jennings is the consummate professional for whom I have grown to admire and rely on over the years. Though I didn't always agree with his decidedly liberal point of view, his demeanor was nonetheless respectful of every single person.
Three years ago, my father succumbed due to emphazema after 40 years of smoking. Though he did quit smoking approximately 10 years before his death, the evils that tobacco played on his body had already taken its toll. Sadly, a few months before his death and whenever gasping for breath, he would look at me with sad eyes and say over and again how much he wished he could just remove his head so that he could inhale just one deep breath.
My prayers go out to Peter Jennings and his family. Please, if you smoke now, seek help to stop this lethal habit before it's too late.
Posted by: Jerry at August 07, 2005 04:18 PM (o/ig2)
11
Looks to me that there really are people out there that would like to see a person die just because of something they said. Pretty shallow individuals. Just remember....what goes around comes around.
I will pray for Peter and all others who have the mis-fortune of contracting any deadly life shortening disease.
Posted by: Joe at August 07, 2005 05:59 PM (VSnbB)
12
Looks like we have Joe the know-it-all and fortune teller with us. Welcome, joe!
Posted by: Kathleen at August 07, 2005 10:03 PM (6krEN)
13
Jennings was too leftist for me no doubt. But the same Jesus that he did such a poor job of reporting on a few years ago loved him and was there if Peter chose to believe that salvation was necessary. Hope he did.
Posted by: Larry at August 08, 2005 08:44 AM (rrgvp)
14
God Bless him. For years I have been wishing he would return to Canada. He was way too far left for me! I hope he chose God as his personal savior near the end. I always thought he a Barbra would have made a cute couple.
Posted by: Pam in Fresno at August 08, 2005 12:02 PM (M/TR+)
15
I think it very cruel to say anything about how smoking is your fault. I am an oncology nurse, and a smoker. I care for smokers, druggies, and people like you. I have seen people live and die, smokers or not.........with cancer. I honestly feel it's in the card you pull....and all of us will die someday, how will we die......in dignity or remouse, living, or dieing anyway is up to us....yes it is true there are things we can do to lessen the odds, but the world is so puluted with chemicals and everything else that WE yes WE have done, either intentionallly or unintentally.........to make money or what ever.....that we are not so innocent, just because we are non smokers. How much smoke does the automobile put out? He that is without sin......throw the first stone. I see so many who without "sin" be so hypocritical..........so without love.........that I wonder about their religion, I wonder about their purity of heart.....if you think an evil thought or say one.............how much more innnocent are you? It is good that I am not a judge........or proscecutor. So go on thinking that you are so innocent. Examine yourself .........hypocrite..........then see if humbly, and without forethought you can judge another.....you who so easily can say............die smoker....its all your fault, by what will you be judged???? Jesus forgave the sinner of ALL his trespasses...........learn that from him. or if not...........go on being a judge, lacking foregiveness......and saying that you are "good".
Posted by: Pat at August 08, 2005 05:13 PM (Hc0o8)
16
I was going to make a comment on some of the malicious things being said for no reason about Peter Jennings, but Pat said it perfectly. He was by no means perfect, but he was good at what he did and it marks the passing of an era.
Posted by: Andrew at August 08, 2005 06:13 PM (evHqy)
17
OK, We've had the sad talking and the slow walking now let's move on. RIP Jennings.
Denzil
Posted by: Denzil Hamblin at August 09, 2005 11:30 AM (Svs3B)
18
Pat, I agree. I'm never going to smoke again, as it makes my chances work, but it can happen to anyone and it sure sucks. Ugh - cancer - I blame industrial chemicals.
Posted by: Vijay Prozak at August 09, 2005 04:17 PM (xdtnQ)
Posted by: Chi at August 10, 2005 11:52 AM (cuTsc)
20
Pat, If income tax doesn't get you, radar will!
Denzil...
Posted by: Denzil Hamblin at August 12, 2005 10:10 AM (Svs3B)
21
A very good and informative article indeed . It helps me a lot to enhance my knowledge, I really like the way the writer presented his views.
DC Hats.
NFL Hats.
DC Hats.
New Era Hats.
Posted by: Monster Energy Hats at July 20, 2011 09:30 PM (csAS/)
22
Well managed and a nicely written blog. The content is really superb. The way of representation is really good. Things are very clear . Points are unique ans straightforward. Keep posting in future.
Posted by: casio px-130 at August 23, 2011 09:10 AM (BkKrk)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Schools affected by NCAA Indian mascot ban
The schools affected by the
ban on "offensive" Indan-based mascots announced yesterday by the NCAA:
Alcorn State University (Braves)Central Michigan University (Chippewas)Catawba College (Indians)Florida State University (Seminoles)Midwestern State University (Indians)University of Utah (Utes)Indiana University-Pennsylvania (Indians)Carthage College (Redmen)Bradley University (Braves)Arkansas State University (Indians)Chowan College (Braves)University of Illinois (Illini)University of Louisiana-Monroe (Indians)McMurry University (Indians)Mississippi College (Choctaws)Newberry College (Indians)University of North Dakota (Fighting Sioux)Southeastern Oklahoma State University (Savages)
Florida State University has historical ties to, and the approval the Seminole tribe of Florida, as related to their nickname. They are expected to appeal the ruling on that basis.
Posted by: mhking at
03:08 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 107 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Will the Atlanta Braves, Washington Redskins, and Cleveland Indians be allowed to attend any NCAA events relating to training camps and drafts?
Posted by: Laurence Simon at August 06, 2005 03:44 AM (HTomA)
2
The University of Utah received permission from the Utes to use their name, as well. This should be interesting. If FSU sues the NCAA and wins, will South Carolina and Mississippi sue the NCAA to remove a similar championshop ban levelled on them for the controversy over their flags?
Posted by: ccs178 (Chris) at August 08, 2005 05:20 AM (B5UVm)
3
championshop = championship
Meh. It's Monday.
Posted by: ccs178 (Chris) at August 08, 2005 05:21 AM (B5UVm)
4
P.C. is ruining this country. Damn!
Denzil...
Posted by: Denzil Hamblin at August 16, 2005 01:41 AM (Svs3B)
5
WE SHOULD BAN ALL NCAA GAMES PLAYED IN A STATE NAMED AFTER AN AMERICAN INDIAN TRIBE.LET US BAN THE FIGHTING IRISH. LET US BAN ALL MASCOTS!
Posted by: ALAN WELCH at August 18, 2005 04:22 PM (fbDlW)
6
A very good and informative article indeed . It helps me a lot to enhance my knowledge, I really like the way the writer presented his views.
DC Hats.
NFL Hats.
DC Hats.
New Era Hats.
Posted by: Monster Energy Hats at July 20, 2011 09:31 PM (csAS/)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 05, 2005
Novak takes the high road; apologizes to viewers

Bob Novak, after his on-air meltdown yesterday, took the time to
apologize to viewers today for his expletive-ridden tirade.
Robert Novak apologized Friday for swearing on the air and walking off a CNN set, but said it had nothing to do with the federal probe sparked by his revelation of a CIA officer's name in a 2003 column."I apologize for my conduct and I'm sorry I did it," he said in an interview.
CNN has pulled him off the air indefinitely. Novak said "I'll follow their guidance" on when he returns.
No muss, no fuss.
I can't excuse his behavior, but I certainly accept his apology. I'm glad he stood up and took his hand-slap like a man.
There's no word, at present, as to when CNN will let him back on the air.
Posted by: mhking at
11:40 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 161 words, total size 2 kb.
1
On 'Hardball with Chris Matthews' the colorful Mr. Matthews said EXACTLY THE SAME THING as Novak in a heated moment. I don't think MSNBC has suspended Matthews.
Posted by: Jeffrey Wyke at August 05, 2005 01:45 PM (aS/3b)
2
Novak is a true proffessional and a gentleman and he showed this by simply walking away from the situation. I know he wanted to knock some teeth out but he kept his cool and walked away. and truthfully, if he had stayed, i think alot more worse things would have come out of his mouth outside of 'bullshit'.
Posted by: phil at August 05, 2005 06:26 PM (bCYFH)
3
Novak is a nutcase who could have handled the situation with aplomb, but instead decided to reveal what an Underman he really is.
Posted by: Vijay Prozak at August 07, 2005 03:43 PM (xdtnQ)
4
Carville can bring that out of anyone. I can't think of a more obnoxious man on earth than that guy.
Denzil...
Posted by: Denzil Hamblin at August 16, 2005 01:48 AM (Svs3B)
5
A very good and informative article indeed . It helps me a lot to enhance my knowledge, I really like the way the writer presented his views.
DC Hats.
NFL Hats.
DC Hats.
New Era Hats.
Posted by: Monster Energy Hats at July 20, 2011 09:31 PM (csAS/)
Posted by: small business seo at August 08, 2011 05:51 AM (L6arP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
NCAA bans Amerindian names; Pro leagues next?

The NCAA announced this morning that they are
banning the display of "hostile or abusive" Indian mascot names in post-season tournaments beginning February 1.
The ruling extends to covering up the logos of schools who have Indian mascots that are presently scheduled to host tournaments. The NCAA plans to prohibit any schools with Indian mascots from hosting tournaments in the future.
The NCAA banned the use of American Indian mascots by sports teams during its postseason tournaments, but will not prohibit them otherwise. The NCAA's executive committee decided this week the organization did not have the authority to bar Indian mascots by individual schools, committee chairman Walter Harrison said Friday.Nicknames or mascots deemed "hostile or abusive" would not be allowed by teams on their uniforms or other clothing beginning with any NCAA tournament after Feb. 1, said Harrison, the University of Hartford's president.
Among the schools to change nicknames in recent years over such concerns were St. John's (from Redmen to Red Storm) and Marquette (from Warriors to Golden Eagles).
The NCAA plans to ban schools using Indian nicknames from hosting postseason events. Harrison said schools with such mascots that have already been selected as tournament sites would be asked to cover any offensive logos.
Such logos also would be prohibited at postseason games on cheerleader and band uniforms starting in 2008.
No word on what, in the eyes of the NCAA, is "hostile or abusive."
No word from schools like Florida State University (Seminoles) or the University of Illinois (Fighting Illini) on what -- if anything -- they plan to do in light of the ruling.
This also begs the question of whether or not professional leagues will force their teams (MLB's Indians or Braves; NFL's Redskins or Chiefs; NHL's Black Hawks; NBA's Warriors) to comply with a similar ruling.
Posted by: mhking at
07:43 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 319 words, total size 2 kb.
August 04, 2005
Darth Vader threatens London & Washington again

Al Qaeda's number two man, Ayman Al-Zawahiri issued a new videotape today, which (of course) was aired by Al Jazeera.
In the tape, Zawahiri promised more attacks on the UK and the US.
Tensions in London were already high, two weeks to the day after the last attempted attacks, and four weeks to the day after the deadly July 7 bombings.
"What you have seen in New York, Washington and Afghanistan are only the initial losses," Zawahiri said in a videotape broadcast by al-Jazeera, the Arabic language satellite channel. "If you [the United States] continue the same hostile policies, you will see something that will make you forget the horrors of Vietnam," Zawahiri threatened in the videotape, a Kalashnikov propped against his right shoulder.Repeatedly pointing a finger for emphasis, the bearded, turbaned Zawahiri, an Egyptian-born doctor and Osama bin Laden's top deputy, said that British Prime Minister Tony Blair shouldered the blame for the July 7 attacks in London that killed 56 people, including four suicide bombers. The tape was released exactly four weeks after the deadly attacks on London's transportation system.
President Bush, at his ranch in Crawford, TX, said that Zawahiri's comments proove that Iraq is part of the war on terror and that the nation is still at war.
Posted by: mhking at
03:51 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 237 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Say what you want about al-Qaeda, but they're holding the biggest nation on earth by its balls. How a bunch of random guys with AK-47s pulled that one off is amazing...
Posted by: Vijay Prozak at August 07, 2005 03:44 PM (xdtnQ)
2
A very good and informative article indeed . It helps me a lot to enhance my knowledge, I really like the way the writer presented his views.
DC Hats.
NFL Hats.
DC Hats.
New Era Hats.
Posted by: Monster Energy Hats at July 20, 2011 09:31 PM (csAS/)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Novak to Carville on CNN's Inside Politics: "I think that's bullshit..."

While talking with James Carville and guest host Ed Henry, CNN's Bob Novak (supposedly the source of the Plame leak) got mad, got up and stormed off in a huff.
Novak was talking about Florida Senatorial candidate Katherine Harris; Carville kept interrupting and wouldn't let Novak get a word in edgewise, finishing with a comment about Novak getting tough for the editorial pages.
Novak's response was a bit more "colorful."
NOVAK: "Well, I think that's bullshit..."
Novak got up, pulled his microphone off and stormed out in a huff.
After Novak's departure, Henry said that he was planning on asking Novak about the CIA leak, but that would have to wait until another time.
Media Matters has video of the exchange with a suitably snarky dig at Novak.
UPDATE 9P ET: CNN has suspended Novak indefinitely as a result of the outburst and walk-off.
A CNN spokeswoman, Edie Emery, called Novak's behavior "inexcusable and unacceptable." Novak apologized to CNN, and CNN was apologizing to viewers, she said."We've asked Mr. Novak to take some time off," she said.
No word from Novak this evening.
Posted by: mhking at
01:38 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 211 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I missed this one, Mike, thanks for the info. Although, Carville is enough to drive anyone away. He looks like he should be perched atop some old European castle.
Posted by: BobG at August 04, 2005 02:58 PM (N+V3m)
2
I'm surprised that someone hasn't called James out earlier.
Ragin' is right.
Posted by: Steven J. Kelso Sr. at August 04, 2005 03:00 PM (U4SDZ)
3
If you are in D.C. and happen to get in the way of Novak when he is driving, you will call him Ragin' as well, if not insane.
Posted by: DarkStar at August 04, 2005 04:50 PM (cnw1A)
4
Novak's behavior was unprofessional and I would feel the same way if Carville had cursed on air. Appropriate behavior is not a liberal or conservative thing, nor is it political correctness either. No matter how you cut it, Novak behaved unprofessionally. Sure, Carville can be annoying as hell, but so can Novak at times. Being an asshole is not exclusive to the right or the left....assholes reside in both red and blue states.
Posted by: B.P. at August 05, 2005 09:20 AM (4UWZh)
5
Yea, I could wave as I drove past him. I'm sure that I was the fastest running around I-495 myself a few times.
Posted by: Steven J. Kelso Sr. at August 08, 2005 03:31 PM (U4SDZ)
6
A very good and informative article indeed . It helps me a lot to enhance my knowledge, I really like the way the writer presented his views.
DC Hats.
NFL Hats.
DC Hats.
New Era Hats.
Posted by: Monster Energy Hats at July 20, 2011 09:31 PM (csAS/)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Jesse Lee Peterson: Dems scaring blacks with Voting Rights Act

Democratic leaders, along wtih civil rights leaders, are
spreading fear through black America regarding the Voting Rights Act, according to Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson, head of Brotherhood Organization of a New Destiny (BOND).
Peterson specifically cites a voter rights march scheduled for Atlanta this weekend, spearheaded by Rev. Jesse Jackson.
“The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was made necessary by the practices of some racist Southern Democrats who opposed equality for Blacks—the same Democratic Party that Jesse Jackson now wants Blacks to support. Jesse Jackson knows that the 15th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees Blacks the right to vote. Yet, he wants to convince Blacks that the Republican Party wants to strip them of their rights. Racism is not keeping Blacks from voting, but their own apathy is.”(Peterson also said,) “The reauthorization of sections of the Voting Rights Act will neither help nor hinder Black voters—to claim otherwise is false! By lying to Black Americans about this issue Jackson and his extremist left-wing cohorts are dishonoring the Selma and Montgomery civil rights pioneers who bled for the cause of civil rights and equality for Blacks.”
The sections in question regard states with a past history of discrimination. The sections require those states to submit changes in voting procedures to the Justice Department for approval.
Part of the issue that Jackson is emphasizing, is the new Georgia requirement for state-issued picture identification in order to vote. The types of identification include driver's licenses. Jackson insists that the requirement -- providing positive identification -- is racist. This is despite the fact that the state will issue -- at no cost -- photo ID to those who cannot afford the cost of said identification.
Uh, yeah. Right.
Posted by: mhking at
03:57 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 304 words, total size 2 kb.
Brooklyn College prof: proper English is language of "white oppressers"

Priya Parmar is an Assistant Professor of Adolescence Education for Brooklyn College's School of Education. Parmar insists that rap music is the be-all, end-all to help teach literacy to inner city students. In addition, Parmar calls the English language the
language of "white oppressers."All this, along with her personal biases against white students in her classes, comes out in Parmar's course, "Language Literacy in Secondary Education," where she insists on politicizing her education course.
Parmar's controversial course at Brooklyn College, "Language Literacy in Secondary Education," typifies the professor's preference for politicized pedagogy. Required of all students who intend to become secondary-school teachers, the course is designed to teach students to draft lesson plans that teach literacy. Parmar's syllabus informs students that the principal focus of these lesson plans must be "social justice."Another theme animating Parmar's course is her aversion to the proper usage of English. To insist on grammatical English, Parmar believes, is to exhibit an intolerable form of cultural chauvinism—a point reinforced by the a preface to the requirements for her course, which adduces the following quotation from the South African writer, Jamul Ndebele: "The need to maintain control over English by its native speakers has given birth to a policy of manipulative open-mindedness in which it is held that English belongs to all who use it provided that it is used correctly. This is the art of giving away the bride while insisting that she still belongs to you."[7] Students are expected to share Parmar's antipathy toward grammatical rule-based English, as she does not countenance dissent: In December of 2005, for instance, several disaffected Brooklyn College students wrote letters to the dean of the School of Education taking issue with Parmar's hostility toward students who dared voice their support for the correct usage of English.
Nor was this the only confrontation between Parmar and her students. Evan Goldwyn, a Brooklyn College student who took Parmar's course, caused a campus storm when he wrote a lengthy critique of the course detailing his objections to Parmar's teaching methods. Topping Goldwyn's list of grievances were Parmar's pronounced bias against English and her alleged bigotry against white students. "She repeatedly referred to English as a language of oppressors and in particular denounced white people as the oppressors," Goldwyn wrote. "When offended students raised their hands to challenge Professor Parmar's assertion, they were ignored. Those students that disagreed with her were altogether denied the opportunity to speak."
An English class as a source for political and philosophical discourse? What happened to teaching the subject matter at hand?
Posted by: mhking at
03:41 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 444 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I wonder how **Ms. Parmar** speaks the Engliah language. I doubt she improperly speaks it herself, but lowers the standards for others. Hmm....
Posted by: shay at August 04, 2005 05:43 AM (0kBuQ)
2
So she's fine with male students referring to her as a bit*h and a ho? Does she encourage misogynistic attitudes towards herself or is she "different?" Or does she separate hip-hop street culture from the language?
If she can do that, then she can surely separate antiquated white oppression from proper English.
Posted by: elgato at August 04, 2005 06:58 AM (kV59d)
3
Why are so many pretty women kooks?
Posted by: Steven J. Kelso Sr. at August 04, 2005 03:09 PM (U4SDZ)
4
A very good and informative article indeed . It helps me a lot to enhance my knowledge, I really like the way the writer presented his views.
DC Hats.
NFL Hats.
DC Hats.
New Era Hats.
Posted by: Monster Energy Hats at July 20, 2011 09:31 PM (csAS/)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 03, 2005
Adidas buying Reebok for $3.8 billion

Number two athletic shoe maker Adidas is
buying number three athletic shoe maker Reebok in a $3.8 billion deal. The combined company gains a good 20 percent of the US market, but still places the duo behind number one Nike.
Neither company is forfeiting their own brands. Adidas Chairman and CEO Herbert Hainer said the brands would stay separate but complement each other — a move that is likely to help them in their competition with Nike.German-based Adidas has its roots in soccer and track and field, while Reebok's line of sneakers and athletic gear is visible across American sports like football, baseball and basketball.
Combining the two, executives said, will mean more access to athletic events just about anywhere there is a stadium.
The two brands will still compete on an in-store basis, so the average consumer won't see much of a change. Likewise, the two brands will retain their sponsorship programs, so you won't see much of a change there either.
Posted by: mhking at
12:11 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 174 words, total size 1 kb.
Florida girl sticks to her principles; turns down college scholarship from ACLU
18 year-old Helena Aldridge is looking forward to a collegiate career at Florida A&M University in Tallahassee. And like many new students, she is dealing with the fiscal realities of paying for college today.
Helena's excellence has garnerd her several scholarships thus far, including a couple from the NAACP.
However, Helena is turning down one of those scholarships -- one from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Florida.
She was thrilled this summer when she learned she was one of three Florida teens to receive a $1,000 Norman Elliot Kent Youth Activist Scholarship from the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida.The group, based in Miami, offers the awards to graduating seniors who have demonstrated a strong commitment to civil liberties and civil rights through student activism.
Then Aldridge read up on the organization.
While she found much to applaud - the ACLU has been protecting rights guaranteed in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights since 1920 - she was dismayed at what she perceived as the group's abortion rights stance on abortion and its opposition to prayer in public schools.
Helena strongly believes that there should be prayer in public schools, and she does not support abortion. She feels it is wrong.
Much to the chagrin of ACLU officials, Helena has graciously declined the ACLU's scholarship monies.
Moreover, her mother is supporting her decision. I'm sure the monies that she would have gotten from the ACLU will come to her from some other source.
I'm very happy to see that she is standing up for what she believes in, despite those who would say otherwise.
Posted by: mhking at
11:27 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 291 words, total size 2 kb.
1
She probably will be stripping at the local titty bar to make up the difference of the ACLU scholarship.....or even worse, perhaps sleeping with some poor sap to get the money. She sounds like a hypocrite in training, which means if she gets knocked up she will have an abortion, quietly of course.
Posted by: B. P. at August 03, 2005 02:25 PM (4UWZh)
2
B.P. - Nothing like a predjudiced liberal! You couldn't have pre-judged someone to any greater extent if you were a grand wizard for the KKK.
Posted by: Odd Brian at August 04, 2005 12:24 PM (ylsZ5)
3
Odd Brian - What part of "probably" did you miss in my post or the word "perhaps"? When I said she sounds like a hypocrite in training, that is simply my opinion, which I am entitled to and of course, I realize that I could be wrong. For you to call me a "predjudiced liberal" is also your opinion, which you are entitled to as well, and of course, you could also be wrong. It is nice to see in your attack on me, that you are able to multi-task in your thinking by being a jackass and a moron at the same time.
Posted by: B.P. at August 04, 2005 01:35 PM (4UWZh)
4
B.P. - You were pre-judging her to be a hypocrite, which by definition makes you prejudiced. No different than if some white guy was to say, "That youth is a black male, so he's (probably) selling crack and (perhaps) raping white women".
I could be wrong about you being a prejudiced liberal, but I was simply making an observation based upon your attack on the girl whom I'm betting you've never met.
You only reinforce my belief that you are a liberal. You fly off the handle calling me a "moron" and "jackass" me after I simply described you using the "L" word. Based upon experience (and I live in a town heavily slanted to the left), liberal's typically become raving lunatics and make personal attacks on anyone that dares disagree with them and/or call them a liberal.
Posted by: Odd Brian at August 04, 2005 02:26 PM (ylsZ5)
5
A very good and informative article indeed . It helps me a lot to enhance my knowledge, I really like the way the writer presented his views.
DC Hats.
NFL Hats.
DC Hats.
New Era Hats.
Posted by: Monster Energy Hats at July 20, 2011 09:31 PM (csAS/)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 02, 2005
If recess appointments are so bad, why did Bubba make so many?

Democrats are wringing their hands over the recess appointment of John Bolton as UN Ambassador by President Bush yesterday.
Members of the Senate have delayed and deferred votes on Bolton's confirmation for months, citing Bolton's "bull in a china shop" method of diplomacy. Just Sunday, Senator Christopher Dodd (Moonbat-CT) called Bolton "damaged goods."
Bush's decision to appoint Bolton without a confirmation vote was denounced by Democrats, who predicted it would undermine the diplomat's credibility at the U.N. and create more partisan rancor on Capitol Hill. Bolton's sharp tongue and direct style have alienated some subordinates, but enchanted many conservatives."At a time when we need to reassert our diplomatic power in the world, President Bush has decided to send a seriously flawed and weakened candidate to the United Nations," said Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid of Nevada. On Sunday, Sen. Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.) called Bolton "damaged goods."
But there were no signs Monday that Democrats would respond to the appointment by taking action against other Bush nominees, such as his choice of John G. Roberts Jr. for the Supreme Court.
Dodd appeared this morning on the various morning news shows denouncing the practice of recess appointments entirely, calling their use by President Bush an abuse of Constitutional power.
Funny thing though, Bush has made a total of 110 recess appointments. His immediate Oval Office predecessor, Bill Clinton, made 140 recess appointments during his two terms in office. That doesn't sound like much of an abuse to me -- that is unless Senator Dodd thinks Bubba abused the power as well.
Posted by: mhking at
03:46 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 283 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Michael,
One show commenting how Ted Kennedy thought that
GWB's recess appointments were bad then how about
his brother JFK using them?
James M. Barber
Posted by: James M. Barber at August 02, 2005 06:51 AM (e0g8B)
2
There is a point where partisan politics becomes treason. Mr. Bolton represents the United States at the UN. Attacking him now is an attack on the U.S.
Posted by: Lee at August 02, 2005 08:33 AM (wrVg8)
3
I like the comments so far...I put up Kennedy's comments on my site. The killer of Chappaquiddick seems to have no problem holding people to a standard that he, himself, can't pass.
Posted by: BobG at August 02, 2005 03:57 PM (+Y0gP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 01, 2005
Discovery astronauts to perform in-orbit repairs

Astronauts on board the International Space Station will be
performing mid-flight repairs to the underside of the space shuttle Discovery Wednesday during an unprecedented space walk.
Filler material is protruding from the underside of the shuttle's fuselage. This material extends more than an inch from the surface of the thermal tiles that protect the body of the shuttle during re-entry. Ordinarily, the material would only extend about a quarter of an inch from the surface of the thermal tiles.
The crew of the space shuttle Discovery will perform an unprecedented on-orbit repair Wednesday, sending an astronaut under the orbiterÂ’s belly to remove a two strips of material jutting out from its tile-covered heat shield, mission managers said Monday.If the filler material sticks out from between tiles during reentry, they can disrupt the aerodynamic flow around the orbiter during reentry, causing higher than normal local heating on the order of hundreds of degrees Fahrenheit, said Chuck Campbell, a NASA subsystem engineer who studies the heating issues associated with shuttle reentry.
“In the end it came down to be a really simple decision,” said Wayne Hale, NASA’s deputy shuttle program manager, during a briefing here at NASA’s Johnson Space Center (JSC). “We came to the conclusion that we don’t know enough to really feel good about this, so therefore the remedy is easy and we ought to go exercise the remedy.”
STS-114 astronaut Stephen Robinson will be manouvered underneath the shuttle using the Space Station's robotic arm, where he will be able to pluck the two pieces of gap filler material from where they are on the belly of the shuttle.
Posted by: mhking at
06:02 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 280 words, total size 2 kb.
July 31, 2005
AlGore-vision replaces NWI tonight at midnight
Al Gore's
CurrentTV replaces Newsworld International tonight at midnight, ET.
Programming is expected to be akin to CBC's artsy program ZeD, with amateur videos produced by viewers and art students.
With it's demise, we lose yet another news resource in this nation.
I expressed my disappointment to DirecTV's VP of Programming, Bob Marsocci this past week.
Mr. Marsocci --
My name is Michael King. I'm a freelance writer and columnist based in Atlanta. I've also been a subscriber to DirecTV for the past couple of years.
Overall, I've been very pleased with DirecTV, and find the service and quality far superior to the service I received previously from Comcast Cable (and in it's earlier guises, AT&T Broadband and MediaOne). The quality of the signal and the variety of networks (both new and old) have been very enjoyable for both me and my family.
The one area that I have a concern in is in the arena of international news. Previously, I was able to watch CNN International's programming (at least on weekends), along with news from Newsworld International. Over the past eight months both services have met their demise on DirecTV. With the end of NWI next week, a view of the news from overseas that many viewers have looked forward to watching will have been silenced.
I understand that the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation has approached DirecTV about continuing to offer some form of news from their auspices following the demise of NWI, but was turned down.
On behalf of many viewers who depend on international news from outside American borders, I ask that you please reconsider your decision. In addition, I'd like to suggest three additional international news services: CNN International, BBC World and SkyNews.
CNN International's return would provide a level and type of international news service that viewers have come to expect from CNN.
BBC World's round-the-clock news coverage would provide news quality that is considered to be second-to-none by many; and as evidenced by BBC World News viewership on PBS stations around the US and on BBC America, domestic viewers would be very interested in receiving programming from BBC World. International travelers already are familiar with BBC World's programming, as they are available to travelers worldwide.
SkyNews is already available in many English-speaking nations around the world, and as a sister company to both DirecTV and Fox News Channel, would provide additional product and content from NewsCorp. SkyNews has won multiple awards for their programming, and it's value as an international counterpart to Fox News is immeasurable. Programmers at FNC already recognize the value of Sky, given the amount of simulcasting Fox News has done of SkyNews programming during the recent London terror attacks.
Please reconsider your decision not to offer additional international news to American viewers. Not only would you provide service to an underserved viewer base, you would offer content that is not presently available on Dish Network or on many cable television systems in the United States.
Thanking you for your consideration, I remain,
Sincerely,
Michael H. King
Mableton, GA
I've yet to hear from Mr. Marsocci, but all I'm honestly expecting in return is a form letter.
They don't give a flying fart as to what we, as viewers, want.
(More coverage from
Wizbang & others)
Posted by: mhking at
06:50 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 553 words, total size 4 kb.
1
I agree, Mike, thanks for sending the letter. I think I shall contact them also.
Posted by: BobG at August 01, 2005 11:16 AM (+Y0gP)
Posted by: 巨人å€å¢— at July 27, 2011 03:37 AM (3jMDH)
Posted by: 巨人å€å¢— at July 27, 2011 03:38 AM (3jMDH)
Posted by: Kaish at January 21, 2012 01:36 PM (Y/P90)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Peanut Farmer says Guantanamo gives terrorist "excuse" to attack US

Former President Jimmy Carter, speaking at the Baptist World Alliance conference in Birmingham, England yesterday, said that the detention of terror suspects at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba was an "embarrasment," and
gives terrorists an "excuse" to attack the United States and US-allied nations.
"I think what's going on in Guantanamo Bay and other places is a disgrace to the U.S.A.," he told a news conference at the Baptist World Alliance's centenary conference in Birmingham, England. "I wouldn't say it's the cause of terrorism, but it has given impetus and excuses to potential terrorists to lash out at our country and justify their despicable acts."Carter said, however, that terrorist acts could not be justified, and that while Guantanamo "may be an aggravating factor ... it's not the basis of terrorism."
"What has happened at Guantanamo Bay ... does not represent the will of the American people," Carter said Saturday. "I'm embarrassed about it, I think its wrong. I think it does give terrorists an unwarranted excuse to use the despicable means to hurt innocent people."
"I thought then, and I think now, that the invasion of Iraq was unnecessary and unjust. And I think the premises on which it was launched were false," he said Saturday.
Jimmy, don't pretend to speak about the "will of the American people." A significant number of Americans
do support the war on terror, your bitch-and-moan fest notwithstanding.
You want to speak for those who don't, that's your business. But don't presume to speak for me.
Posted by: mhking at
07:07 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 268 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Briefly President, he was fired at the first opportunity.
Posted by: Lee at July 31, 2005 08:01 AM (563PP)
2
Honestly...Whay did this man win a Nobel Peace Prize when he "hates" so much.
Posted by: Sgt Fluffy at July 31, 2005 03:53 PM (dxfpU)
3
Yasser Arafat also has a Nobel Peace Prize. Matched set there.
Posted by: Lee at July 31, 2005 04:51 PM (eL5+G)
4
Oh, why can't he just
shut up?!
Let's follow Dana Bash's suggestion and turn the Kennedy compound at Hyannisport into our new detention facility for Islamofascists.
Ted won't mind. He's all for the
Kelo decision, isn't he?
Posted by: Toby Petzold at July 31, 2005 05:54 PM (vNpQ+)
5
The American people passed judgement on Jimmy Carter many years ago, he has yet to acknowledge the results and shut up. Hey Jimmy, if you care so much for this country, why don't you stand up for it instead of trying to undermine it at every opportunity.
Posted by: Dale Buckmaster at August 01, 2005 06:47 AM (PefRH)
6
I think he's broken into the stale Billy Beer again...senile old peanut farmer.
Posted by: BobG at August 01, 2005 11:18 AM (+Y0gP)
7
When Jimmie Carter turned his back on the Shaw of Iran, he demonstrated to all other Arab nations that the US could not be trusted in dealing with Arabs. After all, if you turn your back on a most trusted friend and ally, what will you do to those that arenÂ’t considered a close ally? The Shaw was AmericaÂ’s most trusted ally and friend in the Middle East. Although the Shaw might not have been liked by other Arab nations because of his relationship with the US, he still was an Arab, an Muslim, and the leader of an Arab nation.
Jimmy Carter is the reason why the United States has a hard time getting Arabs to trust us.
Posted by: Bob at August 01, 2005 12:16 PM (KgYbb)
8
I think Carter's a great man. As old as he is, he still helps build housing for the poor. What other ex-president does?
He's right to be ashamed of Gitmo. What is America doing, running a concentration camp? We're supposed to be on moral high ground before we preach democracy to the rest of the world. As Americans, we should ALL be ashamed of Guantanamo.
Posted by: del at August 01, 2005 03:44 PM (JpBHP)
9
Dear MHKING, So you think torturing people who haven't even had the benefit of a trial is something for Americans to be proud of?
This country is great because we don't win by creating a level playing field with the likes of Osama or Saddam or the Taliban. We don't use their methods. It's Un-American.
The harder fight is to win without compromising our deeply held American values.
That's what Former President Carter espouses.
And by the way, anyone who has earned the highest office in this nation deserves respect for that service.
Let me teach you the manners here that your mother apparently forgot. He is entitled to be referred to as our Former President. He wasn't fired. His term ended and he wasn't re-elected, also the will of the people. It's part of the democratic process. There is no shame in losing an election. Certainly not after you've been the leader of the free world for four years, which is more than I can say for you, so don't knock it. I think I can safely assume that you will never win a Nobel Peace Prize either, but I wish you luck in your future.
By the way, he didn't say anything about the war on terror. He's referring to the abuses at Guantanamo Bay, where the Geneva Convention, a clear statement of the will of the American people as to how we want our armed forces to behave in wartime and how we expect our own to be treated, has been suspended, and is not being followed. Individuals are being horrifically mistreated who have not even been legitimately identified as enemies of our country.
Unless we can show by example that our high standards are possible, how can we expect others to follow them? Every time these cases of abuses are brought to light it endangers the safety and lives of American service men and women. If we don't set and hold the standard how can we criticize others actions? That is hypocrisy.
It is a disgrace.
I resent it because it tarnishes the reputation of our military. My Grandfather fought in the Pacific Theatre in WWII and they took many prisoners. Although our American POW's sometimes suffered horribly, we did not mistreat or torture japanese soldiers as POW's. Certainly not as a POLICY. That's one of the ways we knew our way of life was superior and worth the fighting for. There's no tarnish on my Grandfather's Medal of Honor. I resent the actions of those who would tear down the reputation that he and those Americans like him built. Americans have traditionally expected that high standard to be maintained by our soldiers in other conflicts because it represents who we are as a people better than the actions of those who get their jollies peeing on the Koran and torturing people. For your information these are called "war crimes", where people take advantage of the fact that we are at war to express their sick need to harm others. A proud lot there. That's who you identify with?
Well, I think I can safely say, unlike you, most Americans don't identify with them.
We are not torturers. We respect human rights.
Anything less is sinking into barbarism.
Are we fighting barbarians so that we can become like them? I think not.
Posted by: stargazer at September 18, 2005 11:48 AM (M/1Qv)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 30, 2005
Plug pulled on controversial play about KKK

A controversial play about Ku Klux Klan rallies held in Stone Mountain, GA has had it's
plug pulled before it's scheduled performance August 29, because the play's director felt the opening monologue was in "bad taste."
The play, written by black playwright Calvin Ramsey, was an accurate portrayal of the annual KKK rallies held for many years, first on top of Stone Mountain, then, in later years at a field near the base of the granite monolith.
On the nights the Ku Klux Klan held rallies near the poor black neighborhood of Shermantown in Stone Mountain, the residents could hear the racial epithets and hate-filled language lash the air, loosed through big loudspeakers in a nearby pasture.Now, a play about one of those rallies, in 1940, has sparked controversy and the cancellation of the performance at a small theater in the Atlanta suburb.
The owners of Art Station had agreed to stage a reading of "Shermantown — Baseball, Apple Pie and the Klan" on Aug. 27, but pulled the plug after the director decided the opening monologue was in bad taste.
Director David Thomas said this week his board was in agreement that the play, by Calvin Ramsey, was the wrong play at the wrong time in the wrong place.
"The language in the monologue is not only racy, it's inciting, and slanderous about Jews and Catholics," said Thomas.
"We have been in this community for 20 years and work hard to build a relationship with the people who live here. We didn't feel this is appropriate material for our stage."
Ramsey's play is about a salesman from out of town who finds himself in the historically black Shermantown neighborhood of Stone Mountain the night of one of these annual KKK rallies.
Sue Ellen Owens, director of the DeKalb History Center, who is funding the play, says the history is important, and is working to find another venue for the play.
"Although some parts of the play may make the audience uncomfortable, the events and strong language are indicative of the times," said Owens. "You have to look at history, warts and all."
Reverend William Morris, who was born and has lived in Shermantown 77 years said Friday he didn't understand the controversy. "There's nothing offensive about it," he said. "It's the way it was."
It's sad that so many people are so mired in political correctness that they will do whatever is necessary to whitewash accurate portrayals of history in order to assuage their self-worth, and in some cases, self-guilt.
The past is not always pretty. But learning from the truth of our past will help us all grow in the future.
Posted by: mhking at
08:42 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 454 words, total size 3 kb.
1
As another Atlanta conservative, I think it is rather interesting, and disgusting, that complaints were raised against this, but no one complained about the re-enactment of lynchings that took place with actors in "whiteface".
Double standard, anyone?
Posted by: Oze McCallum at July 30, 2005 11:34 AM (Xw7hZ)
Posted by: 巨人å€å¢— at July 27, 2011 03:37 AM (3jMDH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
July 29, 2005
Sharpton slams blacks for supporting Democrats blindly

In what for him is an unusual stance to take, Al Sharpton
blasted blacks Thursday, for what he called blind support of the Democratic Party in general, and former President Bill Clinton in particular.
Sharpton's diatribe came in a speech at the Urban League's annual conference in Washington.
"The whole network of incarceration (of African-American men) happened under this president and the last president. So it wasn't just George Bush. Bill Clinton -- I wish Hillary had hung around -- Bill Clinton built a lot of jails and passed the omnibus crime bill," Sharpton said shortly after Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) had addressed the same panel discussion, entitled "The Black Male: Endangered Species or Hope for the Future?" "And just because Bill can sing "Amazing Grace" well doesn't mean the omnibus crime bill was not a bill that hurt our people," Sharpton told the several hundred people gathered at the Washington Convention Center.
"We must stop allowing people to gain politically from us if they're not reciprocating when dealing and being held accountable," said Sharpton, referring to the allegiance that African-American voters maintain to the Democratic Party.
"As long as we allow people to get elected off of us and deliver nothing to us, then part of our problem is that we have such low political self esteem," he said. "Every time we give them support for no support, we add to the marginalization of black men."
Sharpton said the situation has "gotten so bad that we hold black leaders accountable and give white leaders a pass."
Sharpton challenged the negative images of blacks created by the media and motion pictures, pointing in particular to the newly-released movie "Hustle & Flow," which features Terence Howard as a Memphis pimp-turned-rapper.
In my opinion, Sharpton is certainly moving in a positive direction -- especially when compared with Jesse Jackson, but Sharpton is still out for himself, everyone else be damned.
No matter how he dresses himself, he's still suspect in my book.
Posted by: mhking at
05:23 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 342 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Michael, anyone who paid any attention knows that what Sharpton said has not been out of the ordinary. Sharpton has been blasting the Democrats for some time now.
I've been saying for awhile now that Sharpton has probably done more to shake loose the Democrat lock on Blacks than any Black Republican of note.
Posted by: DarkStar at August 01, 2005 12:15 PM (cnw1A)
Posted by: 巨人å€å¢— at July 27, 2011 03:38 AM (3jMDH)
Posted by: 巨人å€å¢— at July 27, 2011 03:40 AM (3jMDH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
CAIR bullies people into submission
Islam's presentation as a "religion of peace" is coming across as incredibly bogus in light of the Council on American-Islamic Relations' (CAIR) bullying of management at Disney-owned radio station WMAL in Washington.
WMAL has "suspended indefinitely" conservative radio talk show host Michael Graham pending an "investigation" of an opinion Graham presented on the air July 25.
Curiously, this comes behind the beginning of CAIR's concerted and well-defined campaign of contacting WMAL advertisers, asking that they exert pressure on the Disney-owned station regarding some sort of punishment of Graham.
Graham's on-air comments that have excited CAIR include: "Because of the mix of Islamic theology that -- rightly or wrongly -- is interpreted to promote violence, added to an organizational structure that allows violent radicals to operate openly in Islam's name with impunity, Islam has, sadly, become a terrorist organization. It pains me to say it. But the good news is it doesn't have to stay this way, if the vast majority of Muslims who don't support terror will step forward and re-claim their religion."
I'm sorry, but I have to agree with Graham. Believers in Islam around the world have been exceedingly silent regarding the constant and increasing levels of terrorism perpetrated in the name of Islam. The voices of dissent from within have been miniscule at best since 9/11.
Ironically, on July 28, CAIR announced a "fatwa" or religious edict against Islamic terrorism, a scant four years after the 9/11 terror attacks.
It sounds to me like CAIR is trying to clean up their own muddling mess in order to make them look better in light of their bullying of Disney. As much as CAIR tries to dress it up, until and unless they can take a stronger and more legitimate stand against Islmaic terror both in America and across the globe, CAIR looks more like a complicit organizations trying to justify terror than a moderate voice of reason trying to help rehabilitate their religion and religious zealots.
Posted by: mhking at
03:49 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 347 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Michael, I've heard that CAIR's fatwa was a hoax/fraud/simply wasn't true. I think that I read that on LGF...either way, that slimy bastard would stone his own mother to accomplish his goals.
Posted by: skh at July 29, 2005 08:23 AM (c0W4c)
2
I spoke to CAIR's spokesman on c-span about sexism and wahhabism in American mosques. He poo-pooed them both. He was disingenuous at best.
Posted by: Curtis at July 29, 2005 11:23 AM (bGETy)
Posted by: jenny at July 30, 2011 01:28 PM (fEoCB)
Posted by: rosy at November 17, 2011 10:29 PM (d7Qlq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
WMAL Washington suspends Michael Graham for anti-Islamic comments

WMAL radio talk-show host Michael Graham has been
"suspended indefinitely" by the Disney-owned radio station pending an "investigation" of comments critical of Islamic terrorists. The suspension apparently comes at the behest of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), who vehemently protested Graham's on-air statements.
Graham's comments -- which were his opinion -- caught the ire of CAIR officials.
"Because of the mix of Islamic theology that -- rightly or wrongly -- is interpreted to promote violence, added to an organizational structure that allows violent radicals to operate openly in Islam's name with impunity, Islam has, sadly, become a terrorist organization. It pains me to say it. But the good news is it doesn't have to stay this way, if the vast majority of Muslims who don't support terror will step forward and re-claim their religion."
CAIR has issued multiple releases condemning Graham's opinions, and indicating that someone with those opinions shouldn't be employed by Disney. CAIR is orchestrating a concerted campaign of contacting WMAL's advertisers, in order to have them pressure WMAL to get Graham fired.
And apparently they have succeeded.
I guess Disney only believes in a talk show host having an opinion of his own when it doesn't piss off CAIR or some other group of hand-wringers.
Posted by: mhking at
03:36 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 223 words, total size 2 kb.
1
So peaceful Muslims SHOULDN'T "reclaim their religion"?
Posted by: Echo Zoe at July 29, 2005 05:26 AM (K+h36)
2
I question the seriousness of peaceful Muslims in that regard. Call me curmudgeonly, call my cynical, but if they were serious, we would have seen more efforts, as opposed to the bullying of Disney in a case like this.
Posted by: Michael at July 29, 2005 05:28 AM (bJ0qq)
3
Fact; "Christianity" As-Religion Lied Motiv of Most Worlds Violence Escape-Anyone? "Islam" By-Comparason, (And Body-Count) Peaceful!
Posted by: Ymir-Jule at July 30, 2005 05:35 AM (iVTRk)
4
Call a spade a spade. The Koran condones and promotes killing "infidels". There is nothing peaceful about that religion. Put Michael Graham back on the air and quit pussy footing around with a terrorist sponsoring religion.
Posted by: Bill at August 22, 2005 12:37 PM (dljyD)
5
Are you crazy?? What have you done?
You have put a truth teller off the air!
Get him back on immediately and never Kow Tow to these terrorist bastards. They deserve to be offended.
Why have you folded? Dont hide behind bullshit policy.
Posted by: Lin Ronald at August 22, 2005 07:47 PM (O5eh9)
Posted by: 巨人å€å¢— at July 27, 2011 03:36 AM (3jMDH)
Posted by: 巨人å€å¢— at July 27, 2011 03:38 AM (3jMDH)
8
e thanks to to
Ralph Lauren
Paris to the 1996 Summer Olympics and since then has been many retirees
looking for an international city that's not overwhelming. overwhelming.
polo ralph lauren overwhelming.
The city is home to numerous colleges including Georgia and Emory, as well as
multiple professional sports teams. Culturally, Culturally,
Posted by: dsges at July 27, 2011 09:15 PM (NbYxa)
Posted by: jenny at July 30, 2011 01:28 PM (fEoCB)
Posted by: rosy at November 17, 2011 10:27 PM (d7Qlq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Helen Thomas promises seppuku if Cheney runs for President

White House columnist (and resident Stone Troll) Helen Thomas is
promising to commit suicide if Vice President Dick Cheney runs for President in 2008.
"The day Dick Cheney is going to run for president, I'll kill myself," she told the HILL. "All we need is one more liar."Thomas added, "I think he'd like to run, but it would be a sad day for the country if he does."
"Run, Dick, Run!"
All Helen needs is some industrial strength prune juice. Her constipation is showing.
(More coverage from
Wizbang & others)
Posted by: mhking at
02:50 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 106 words, total size 1 kb.
1
If I thought she was serious, I'd volunteer to help start a draft Cheney for president movement tomorrow. I have a comical take on this story over at my site.
Posted by: BobG at July 29, 2005 05:06 AM (3usbu)
Posted by: Michael at July 29, 2005 05:29 AM (bJ0qq)
Posted by: bahamas charter flights at August 17, 2011 01:06 AM (Maf/v)
4
great post, thank you so much
Posted by: miami charter flights at August 17, 2011 01:06 AM (Maf/v)
5
very useful post I've read
Posted by: florida charter flights at August 17, 2011 01:07 AM (Maf/v)
Posted by: soniashah at August 17, 2011 11:09 PM (Ab0xz)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
135kb generated in CPU 0.0367, elapsed 0.1173 seconds.
57 queries taking 0.0941 seconds, 243 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.